From the ivory tower

Comments on life from inside the university

Location: Canada

Saturday, October 01, 2005

The campus poker scene

As I turned the corner, I could feel the excitement coming from down the hall. Everyone was getting ready for what could be a long night if they managed to stay ahead of the 50 person field, in what was one of the first large-scale organized tournaments on campus. I didn't stay long. I played a cash game on the side, and left after a couple of hours. I was mainly there to get a feel for the level of play, and quality of the tournament organization. It was fun to be there. Students had their sports jerseys on, and were wearing caps from their favourite online poker sites. There was a lot of story sharing. One student was reminiscing the thousand dollar swings in his bankroll of the past week, as other students eagerly listened, and asked how they too could get involved. "Oh, it's easy, just go online and sign up." "How much money do I need?" "A $500 deposit should be fine." The entrepeneuring students were giving out phone numbers to help connect others with the various cash games going on in the residences, or referals to the online poker site they play on (a lot of these sites have bonuses if an existing player can recruit new ones). It's incredible how popular poker is on campus. I mean, it's somewhat expected, but it's still incredible. For the concerned parent out there, think of the hundred or so worse things your kids could be doing rather than playing cards.

This sports illustrated on campus report provides some more insight:

I'll be going to more of these, and hopefully reporting back. The entertainment is worth the buy-in itself.

How's the poker scene on your campus?

Thursday, September 29, 2005


A lot of us have had them. Really bad professors. I don't mean the profs that run difficult courses or those with limited charisma. I mean the really bad ones: the ones who are habitually late, who insult students, who don't really care if the students are benefiting, who don't know the material as well as they should, the ones without an ounce professionalism. The ones that really make class a dreadful experience.

What are the students supposed to do? Complain? They do. But rarely is anything ever done by the administration. Perhaps they'll have a meeting with the professor, and ask him to clean up his act, but as far as the students are concerned nothing gets done. So they wait it out, clench their teeth, hope to make it through the semester, and in future avoid any course taught by this professor. You can hear them lament, "what a waste of money."

The university, regardless of what some of the academic elite believe, provides a service for a fee. And when a single course can cost hundreds, if not thousands of dollars, it's no wonder that students turn to sites like that allow them to
vent their frustrations, and more importantly prevent other students from making the same mistake. It's even worse for students in smaller, specialized departments where there is only section per class, and there is no way to avoid a bad professor if they are running a required course. Sure, we all had those course evaluations at the end of the term, where we were given our chance to lay into the prof. We were told that our comments were considered, but was anythign really done? Did students of the following year get to read our reviews? At my alma mater, we merely got an average the scores that students assigned to the different categories. That is why a site like is so popular. Students get to read the actual comments of other students. Words provide more substance than a simple numerical avergae.

The university administration doesn't seem to understand how serious of a problem bad professors are, or they just don't care. There are professors, thankfully just a few, who literally do the bare minimum that is required for a course. That is, they do just enough work to make sure there are some sensible marks that can be entered into the database at the end of the year.

It's about time the university administration took stock of the situation. But still, it was no surprise to read in Wired that the university faculty and administration were denouncing sites such as ratemyprofessor. My favourite comment is at the end of the article, when Chet Robie asks "Just because many professors are being paid by taxpayers, does that mean they give up all rights to privacy?" Chet, who said anything about all rights to privacy? I don't care what my prof does in the privacy of his own home, but yes, they should give up the right to privacy of what happens in the classroom. Accountability to the taxpayer is paramount here. Shall we compare the professor's job to other tax-funded positions? No one complains when taxpayers demand their politicians to be accountable. We get to see what happens in congress/parliament on a daily basis. Besides, it can be argued how much of a professor's salary actually comes from taxes, and how much comes from the pockets of the 150 students who each paid $500 for the course.

To and other sites like it, keep up the good work.

What do you think? Any bad-prof experiences you want to share?

And by the way, check out Chet's ratings.